Easy Small Business HR

Menu
  • HOME
  • ARTICLES BY TOPIC
    • All Articles
      • Background Checks
      • Dealing with Difficult Employees
      • Diversity
      • Employee Benefits
      • Employee Performance
      • Employee Retention & Engagement
      • Employee Theft
      • Employee Turnover
      • Employment Law
      • Fair Labor Standards/FLSA
      • Family Medical Leave/FMLA
      • Firing/Disciplinary Actions
      • Managing Employees
      • Pay and Salary
      • Policies and Procedures
      • Recruitment, Interviewing, Hiring
      • Supervisor Tips and Strategies
      • Workplace Safety
    • Close
  • RESOURCES
  • PODCAST
  • ABOUT US

August 25, 2014 by Dianne Shaddock Leave a Comment

California Employers: Learn From These Recent Court Decisions

California Employers: Learn From These Recent Court Decisions

California employers would do well to pay attention to a flurry of Supreme Court decisions dealing with employment law over the past year. The decisions touch upon a broad range of issues and effect privately held companies, publicly traded organizations and government agencies.

One of the most significant decisions involves the anti-retaliation protections provided to employees of public companies under the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act of 2002. The Supreme Court held that employees of a public company’s private contractors and subcontractors are eligible for whistleblower protections under SOX in the same manner as any other public company employee.

The ruling involves a case in which employees of FMR LLC, a private contractor filed a lawsuit against their employer under Sarbanes-Oxley. The employees claimed they were unfairly terminated for reporting fraud at Fidelity, a public company for which they were working as contractors. FMR had argued that Sarbanes Oxley did not apply in this case because it was a private company. The Supreme Court however disagreed and held that employees of non-publicly traded companies may indeed sue under SOX if their employer provides services to a public company.

Working on improving employee engagement?

EPIC is an Employee Engagement software that gives you the tools and insights to create a workplace culture that encourages engagement, loyalty, and trust.

TRY IT RISK FREE HERE

Another Supreme Court decision with widespread implications involves severance payments made to employees who are involuntarily laid off.

Quality Stores claimed that severance payments made to employees who were terminated should not be subject to Social Security taxes, Medicare and other withholdings. The United States Internal Revenue Service argued that lump sum severance payments were a form of wages and were therefore subject to the tax withholding provisions of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). The Supreme Court sided with the IRS and held that while lump-sum severance pay could not be considered as remuneration for specific work, it was indeed employment-related and therefore subject to tax withholdings.

The decision means California employers will need to pay closer attention to how they structure severance packages if they want to avoid FICA taxes. According to analyst firm Ernst & Young, companies still have an opportunity to save on taxes if they structure severance payments in a manner that is compliant with IRS rules for supplemental employment benefits.

There were at least two other Supreme Court decisions over the past year with potentially far reaching implications for California employers. One of them involved free speech issues while the other touched upon provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

In Lane Vs Franks the Supreme Court ruled that employees of public sector firms have a First Amendment right to speak against their employer on matters of public concern or matters involving the public employer’s interests.

In Sandifer v. United States Steel Corporation, the Supreme Court held that the time employees spend donning and taking off protective gear in the workplace is not compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Additional sources:

For Lawson Vs. FMR: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/lawson-v-fmr-llc/

For Lane Vs. Franks: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/lane-v-franks/

For Sandifer Vs U.S. Steel Corp: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/sandifer-v-united-states-steel-corporation/

Quality Stores: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY_Severance_pay_after_Quality_Stores/$FILE/EY-Severance-pay-planning-post-Quality-Stores.pdf

The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Dianne Shaddock

President and Founder at Easy Small Business HR
Get more tips on interviewing, hiring, managing and engaging your employees. Dianne Shaddock is the President of Easy Small Business HR, Employee Hiring and Managing Tips and the author of the eGuides, "How To Supervise:  What Your Boss Never Told You Before You Took the Job", A Step-By-Step Guide For New and Seasoned Managers and "How To Find and Hire the Best Employees".
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Latest posts by Dianne Shaddock (see all)

  • Build the Best Team for Your Small Business - November 12, 2019
  • Cross Training Staff – Doing the Right Thing For the Wrong Reasons - January 18, 2019
  • Proactive Employee Management Really Boils Down To The Basics - December 21, 2015
  • Office Meetings Do Not Have To Be A Productivity Time Drain If Done Right - November 17, 2015
  • Proposed Changes To Employee Rights Laws: WAGE Act Bill - November 3, 2015

Filed Under: Employment Law, Policies and Procedures, Supervisor Tips and Strategies Tagged With: recent supreme court decisions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I accept the Privacy Policy

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Be Social, Let’s Connect!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on Google+Follow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on YouTubeFollow Us on Reddit
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on Google+Follow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on YouTubeFollow Us on RedditFollow Us on iTunes

Recent Posts

  • Build the Best Team for Your Small Business
  • Cross Training Staff – Doing the Right Thing For the Wrong Reasons
  • Proactive Employee Management Really Boils Down To The Basics
  • Office Meetings Do Not Have To Be A Productivity Time Drain If Done Right
  • Proposed Changes To Employee Rights Laws: WAGE Act Bill

Recent Comments

  • Henry Killingsworth on Clearing Up Legal Misperception of Reference Checking
  • Nyangoma Rachel on Diversity in the Workplace: Benefits, Challenges and Solutions
  • Online Training on Workplace Negativity Is Contagious – Here’s How You Can Control an Outbreak
  • Kristofina Grace on Diversity in the Workplace: Benefits, Challenges and Solutions
  • Jemal Oumer on Leadership Series: Introduction to Adaptive Leadership, Part 1
  • Earl Rogers on Performance Appraisals for Small Business – Why You Need To Be On Board

Top 25 Online Influencers in Human Resources

HR Examiner Top 25

Copyright © 2023 · Executive Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in